CO129-529-4 China- extraterritoriality 23-11-1931 - 31-12-1931 — Page 46

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

3.

that treaties constitute law but they insist that

Chinese judicary will not permit of so radical a

departure from provision of Chinese criminal code.

New version represents result of our attempts to

make privileges we seek compatible with provisional

code which gives judge discretion in cases of all offences punishable by imprisonment up to six months and in cases of certain offences punishable by imprisonment up to one year of imposing fine instead.

But to avoid conflicting with code and Chinese legal

procedure payment for fine instead of imprisonment

must be made before and not after sentence is delivered.

Clause 6. Chinese insist that court must have some

discretion in regard to bail.

nationalities in mind.

They have other

Clause 7. This stands

unchanged at present but Hsu Mo, while himself

considering it acceptable, makes reservation that it

is still under expert examination. Clause 8. They

fought hard to cut this out as derogatory since trials

were naturally open to public. I insisted that we must have it and eventually amended version was

accepted on understanding that it could, if Chinese

so desired be moved to a separate declaration.

6. My preliminary work with Hsu Mo is now

completed and I shall have no further discussions

with him until His Majesty's Minister arrives.

7.

46

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.